<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chown &#8211; it.megocollector.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://it.megocollector.com/tag/chown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://it.megocollector.com</link>
	<description>The information technology compendium</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2023 21:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Best Practice for chown</title>
		<link>https://it.megocollector.com/linux/best-practice-for-chown/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chown]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://it.megocollector.com/?p=3638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Over the years, I have seen a couple of variations with the use of the chown command. The &#8220;:&#8221; (colon) vs &#8220;.&#8221; (dot).&#160; While studying for the RHEL6 exam sometime ago, the books that I had used each had one or the other in their documentation.&#160; I have read that the posix standard is using chown with the &#8220;:&#8221; (colon)....]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
